Straight Out Of Richmond

Popular Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Ins. Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 52355(U) (Civ. Cit. Richmond County, 2009)

2 Responses to Straight Out Of Richmond
  1. Joe Armao
    November 24, 2009 | 10:27 pm

    Apparantly the Rules of Evidence refuse to cross the Verrazzano. I have decisions out of Hempstead that directly contradict this nonsense if anybody wants them.

  2. Zuppa's Pit
    November 28, 2009 | 10:29 am

    Hempstead is a haven for those who love the strict application of the rules of evidence. Ever since Richardson moved there the place rocks.

    The drawback is it appears that Hempstead is the only place that applies the rules of evidence.

    And about Federal Court — oh my. You’d think there would be a level of decorum and deportment that many would fail to live up to — an overall high level of professionalism. At least for the insurance companies there are no rules of evidence, formal requirements for RICO Pleadings and/or fraud pleadings.

    All people do is write letters to the judge attacking opposing counsel using opposing counsel’s name.

    You have to ask permission by letter to do anything. “Your honor may I have a conference so that I can show up at the conference and beg to be allowed to make a motion to dismiss.” Then the insurance company lawyer writes his own letter insulting you by name: “Mr. Smith is a heinous man who is merely trying to protect his guilty client by representing him. This type of devious behavior on Mr. Smith’s part should not be allowed. I want sanctions.”

    It is so efficient.

Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.nofaultparadise.org/2009/11/23/straight-out-of-richmond/trackback/