Eric Turkewitz posted about a recent Appellate Division decision that appears to allow accident victims to sue IME doctors.
Eric Turkewitz posted about a recent Appellate Division decision that appears to allow accident victims to sue IME doctors.
2nd verification issued on 30th day
4th Dept
22 NYCRR 202.21[d]
3211(a)(1)
App. Div. 2nd
Assignment
Class Action
CLE
Coverage
CPLR
CPLR R. 2106
Declaratory Judgment
Denial Typo
Discovery
DJ action
EUO
Fee Schedule
Fraud
Frye
Jurisdiction
Late Notice of Claim
Mallela
Material Misrepresentation
Motivation
NICB
NYLJ
Peer Review
Policy
Prima Facie
SCOTUS
Service through Ins Dept
Severance
Signature
SIU
Summary Judgment
TED
Trial de-novo
Wrap up 2nd verification issued on 30th day (1)
45 day rule (3)
a (1)
App Term 2nd (3)
App. Div. 2nd (1)
Appellate Division (8)
Appellate Procedure (2)
Arbitration (2)
Attorney fees (2)
Bad Faith (7)
Books (2)
Class Action (3)
CLE (2)
Collateral Estopptel (2)
Complaints (1)
Contract Reformation (1)
Coverage (3)
CPLR Amendments (1)
Dan Med (6)
Declaratory Judgment (5)
Default Judgments (7)
Denials (5)
Depositions (2)
Discovery (4)
DWI (2)
EUO (4)
Evidence (1)
Experts (1)
Fee Schedule (4)
Fraud (4)
Geico (3)
Generally Accepted Medical Pracitce (2)
Grammar (2)
hearsay no fault insured (1)
Hippa (1)
IME no show (2)
Insurance Law Amendments (1)
Interest (2)
Jobs (1)
Law Journal (2)
Legal writing (3)
Letter To The Editor (1)
LMK (1)
LMT (1)
Mailing (3)
Material Misrepresentation (1)
medical collections (1)
Medical Necessity (10)
Medical Records (1)
New Blog (1)
New York Law Journal (1)
no fault collections (1)
no fault law (182)
no-fault attorneys (1)
Notice to Admit (1)
Opinion Letter (1)
Peer Reviews (3)
Personal Jurisdiction (1)
Policy Issues (3)
Prima Facie (3)
progressive (4)
Recap (1)
settlements (2)
Summary Judgment (3)
Typos (1)
Uncategorized (510)
Verification (7)
Video (1)
Workers Comp (1)
Wrap up (4)
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Copyright © 2012 New York No Fault Paradise
David david david… rumors are floating about that you have a nasty habit of egging on your fellow attorneys. I find it very difficult to understand why lawyers who are doing the bidding of partners, get so fired up about cases they are TOLD to tend to and their outcome. There is such a thing as passion for what you do, and then there is strange, head-first, swan-diving into what you do even when it doesn’t effect the outcome. The partners are the movers and shakers and the counselors are just earning a living. Not making any accusations, just serving food for thought… Relax dude.
You could have just emailed me instead of making the single-most retarded comment ever to grace this blog.
Even so, I engage my fellow attorneys in animated discourse, which can include “egging people on” to some extent. But it’s really easy to avoid. I won’t follow anyone into a hallway if they don’t want to talk to me. No one has to talk to me. In most cases, I’d prefer it if they didn’t.
You can think what you want, but I don’t believe you can be passionate about what you do and be satisfied with “just earning a living.”
Aside from all that, this isn’t the place to give me food for thought. Talk to me in person or email me.
David Please Egg Me On. Dare me to be better and bolder.
David is about Justice in the process as in “due process.” Not the outcome which is factually dependent. If the process is warped forget about justice.