h/t, the award nominated Mr. Damin Toell, Esq.


h/t, the award nominated Mr. Damin Toell, Esq.


2nd verification issued on 30th day
4th Dept
22 NYCRR 202.21[d]
3211(a)(1)
App. Div. 2nd
Assignment
Class Action
CLE
Coverage
CPLR
CPLR R. 2106
Declaratory Judgment
Denial Typo
Discovery
DJ action
EUO
Fee Schedule
Fraud
Frye
Jurisdiction
Late Notice of Claim
Mallela
Material Misrepresentation
Motivation
NICB
NYLJ
Peer Review
Policy
Prima Facie
SCOTUS
Service through Ins Dept
Severance
Signature
SIU
Summary Judgment
TED
Trial de-novo
Wrap up 2nd verification issued on 30th day (1)
45 day rule (3)
a (1)
App Term 2nd (3)
App. Div. 2nd (1)
Appellate Division (8)
Appellate Procedure (2)
Arbitration (2)
Attorney fees (2)
Bad Faith (7)
Books (2)
Class Action (3)
CLE (2)
Collateral Estopptel (2)
Complaints (1)
Contract Reformation (1)
Coverage (3)
CPLR Amendments (1)
Dan Med (6)
Declaratory Judgment (5)
Default Judgments (7)
Denials (5)
Depositions (2)
Discovery (4)
DWI (2)
EUO (4)
Evidence (1)
Experts (1)
Fee Schedule (4)
Fraud (4)
Geico (3)
Generally Accepted Medical Pracitce (2)
Grammar (2)
hearsay no fault insured (1)
Hippa (1)
IME no show (2)
Insurance Law Amendments (1)
Interest (2)
Jobs (1)
Law Journal (2)
Legal writing (3)
Letter To The Editor (1)
LMK (1)
LMT (1)
Mailing (3)
Material Misrepresentation (1)
medical collections (1)
Medical Necessity (10)
Medical Records (1)
New Blog (1)
New York Law Journal (1)
no fault collections (1)
no fault law (158)
no-fault attorneys (1)
Notice to Admit (1)
Opinion Letter (1)
Peer Reviews (3)
Personal Jurisdiction (1)
Policy Issues (3)
Prima Facie (3)
progressive (4)
Recap (1)
settlements (2)
Summary Judgment (3)
Typos (1)
Uncategorized (510)
Verification (7)
Video (1)
Workers Comp (1)
Wrap up (4)
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Copyright © 2010 New York No Fault Paradise
If this is true, can it be POSSIBLE that there would be changes occurring in other areas of treatments parameters as well? How is it that ACU gets a fee increase, yet physical med/Chiro/Neuro PT fee schedules have NOT changed / remained the same since 1995?
Wild rumors are abound that chiropractors might see an increase one of these years. It is really disgusting that they only get $33.70 per visit.
I believe that this amendment in fair and justifiable. However, as the law stands now, it is clear that, as a matter of law, a licensed acupunctuirst is only entitled to the chiropractic rate. The Appellate Division, Second Department has made this clear on numerous occasions. There should be no debate about this issue. I am surprised that plaintiff’s continue to argue otherwise. If they should happen to prevail, it is only because the judge or arbitrator is misinformed about the law or feels sympathy with the acupuncturist. However, I do believe that the proposed amendment is fair.
The fee schedule is generally very low. 95% of the rates are less than 1/3 of the amounts paid by major medical. Then everyone wonders why no-fault providers tend not to be A students.